Why Influence?
Everyday
Modern
Definitions
# of Tactics?
16 Tactics
53 Tactics
Ethics I
Ethics II
Disciplines
Approach
Bad Info
Structure
Mindfulness
Mindlessness
Matrix
Bibliography
Classwork
Links
|
|
Aronson, E. (1995). The social animal. Seventh edition. New
York: W. H. Freeman.
Brendl, C. M., Higgins, E. T., Lemm, K. M. (1995). Sensitivity
to varying gains and losses: The role of self-discrepancies and
event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
69(6), 1028-1051.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P.
Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence:
The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
San Diego: Academic Press.
Cialdini, R. B., Eisenberg, N., Green, B. L., Rhoads, K. v. L.,
and Bator, R. (1997). Undermining the undermining effect of reward
on sustained interest. In press, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Corbett, E. P. J. (1990). Classical rhetoric for the modern student.
Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Degen, C. (1987). Communicator's guide to marketing. Salem: Sheffield.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured
paradigm. Special Issue: The future of the field: Between fragmentation
and cohesion. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New
York: McGraw Hill.
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception:
The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.
Ganzach, Y. & Karsahi, N. (1995). Message framing and buying
behavior: A field experiment. Journal of Business Research, 32(1),
11-17.
Hassan, Steven. (1990). Combatting Cult Mind Control. Rochester,
Vermont: Park Street Press. (ISBN 0-89281-311-3)
Hovland, C. I., Janis I. L., & Kelley, H. H. Communication
and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis
of decision under risk. Econometirca 4, 362-377; Econometrica
47, 263-291.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences.
Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames.
American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
Kanouse D. E. & Hanson, L. R. Jr. (1972). Negativity in evaluations.
Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Krosnick, J. A. & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The media and the
foundations of presidential support: George Bush and the Persian
Gulf conflict. Journal of Social Issues , 49, 167-182.
Krosnick, J. A. & Miller J. M. (1996). News media impact
on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of
research on the priming hypothesis. Chapter 3 of unpublished
manuscript.
Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice
and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment
in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 334, 191-198.
Lanham, R. A. (1983). Analyzing Prose. New York: Scribner's.
Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (Eds.) (1978). The hidden costs
of reward. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining
children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129-137.
Levin (1987). Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin
of the Psychnomic Society, 25, 85-86.
Levin, Chapman & Johnson (1988). Confidence in judgments
based on incomplete information: An investigation using both
hypothetical and real gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision
Making, 1, 29-41.
Levin, I. P. & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected
by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming
the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
Loke, W. H. (1989). The effects of framing and incomplete information
on judgments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10 (3) 329-341.
Maheswaran, D. and Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message
framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research,
27, 361-367.
Meyerowitz, BE and Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message
framing on breast self-exam attitudes, intentions, and behavior.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
Meyers, D. G. Social Psychology. (1990). Third edition. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Mulholland, J. (1994). Handbook of persuasive tactics: A practical
language guide. London: Routledge.
Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing
of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(2), 228-241.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective
attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster
and C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition
(pp. 207-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ogilvy, D. (1985). Ogilvy on advertising. New York: Vintage Books.
Perloff, R.M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and
persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion:
Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: Brown.
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive
Responses in Persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral
decision research: a constructive process perspective. Annual
Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
Pratkanis, A. & Aronson, E. (1992). Age of Propaganda. Freedman:
New York.
Putnam, L. L., & Holmer, M. (1992). Framing, reframing, and
issue development. Communication and negotiation. Sage annual
reviews of communication research, Vol. 20. (Linda L. Putnam,
Michael E. Roloff, Eds.), pp. 128-155. Sage Publications, Inc.,
Newbury Park, CA.
Roney, C. J. R., Higgins, E. T., Shah, J. (1995). Goals and framing:
How outcome focus influences motivation and emotion. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1151-1160.
Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom:
Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. New
York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based
choice. Cognition , 49, 11-36.
Simonson, I. & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff
contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research,
29, 281-295.
Simonson, I. (1993). Get closer to your customers by understanding
how they make choices. California Management Review , 35, 68-84.
Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., & O'Curry, S. (1994). Experimental
evidence on the negative effect of product features and sales
promotions on brand choice. Marketing Science, 13, 23-40.
Simonson, I., Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, Y. (1993). The effect
of irrelevant preference arguments on consumer choice. Journal
of Consumer Psychology , 2, 287-306.
Singer, M. T. & Lalich, J. (1995). Cults in Our Midst. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and
persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin 22(3), 257-268.
Smith, S. M. & Shaffer, D. R. (1991). Celerity and cajolery:
Rapid speech may promote or inhibit persuasion through its impact
on message elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
17, 663-669.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social
perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling
nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 35, 656-666.
Spence, G. (1995). How to argue and win every time. New York:
St. Martin's Press.
Tversky, A . & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions
and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Tykocinski, O., Higgins, E. T., Chaiken, S. (1994). Message framing,
self-discrepancies, and yielding to persuasive messages: The
motivational significance of psychological situations. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 107-115.
Copyright © 1997 by Kelton Rhoads, Ph.D.
www.workingpsychology.com
All rights reserved.
Adherence, advertise, advertising,
advocacy, analysis, arizona state university, asu, art of persuasion,
arguing, argument, argumentation, attitude, attitude change,
belief, bias, brad sagarin, brainwashing, campaign, communicate,
communication, conversion. Compliance, comply, conform, conformity,
consult, consultant, consulting, course, courtroom, credibility,
credible, cult, cults, debate, decision making, education, emotion,
executive education, executive program, executive training. Group,
how to, influence, influencing, kelton rhoads, kelton rhodes,
kris haynal, law, leadership, leadership training, leadership
education, legal, likability, management, management, market
research, marketing, mass marketing, mass persuasion, mass influence,
mind control, motivation, negotiation, obedience, opinion, organizational
services, personality, persuade. Persuasion, persuasive, political,
political consulting, politics, polling, influence principles,
professional services, program, promote, promotion, propaganda,
psychological persuasion, psychological operations, psyop, psychological
research, psychology, psychology of persuasion, psychology of
influence, public relations, questionnaire, reinforcement, reputation.
Research, rhetoric, rhetorical, rhoads, rhodes, rhods, rodes,
rhoads, robert cialdini, chaldini, sales, sampling, science of
persuasion, science of influence, sell, selling, small group
research, social influence, social psychology, social action
campaign, speaker, speech, spin, statistics, strategy, survey,
technique, trial, university of southern california, usc, workshop,
working psychology, work.
|